Charting all of my sexual conquests creates a list that is severely lopsided in one direction. 'Conquests' perhaps is not the right word. That implies offense, battering rams, hordes of marauding mercenaries spilling over village walls. I don't seek and conquer women. I set sexual traps.
I was walking across the street the other day, minding the oncoming traffic, when my head suddenly filled with the catalogue of females i've dated, been involved with, or even just flirted with heavily. I was standing on the curb, but instead of waiting for a break in the flow of cars, i wanted one to stop dead still for me, so that i could proceed. I moved my body onto the street, and nudged my way out into the boulevard until some unlucky sap stepped on the brakes, seeing that i was resolute and held the winning position in this game of chicken. My romantic exploits mimick this. I continued on my way, following the pattern i was tracing in my head that demonstrated a regular practice of baiting the females in my life.
From the earliest time that i explored the dynamic of inter-gender intimacy, i would identify someone i liked then make my cast to entice her interest in me. I'd dangle my baby blues, my charm long enough for her to get hooked. But, that would be as far as i would go. I wouldn't "close the deal". She would have to make the first move. Once she did, once her appendages got stuck to the fibers of my web, i'd come out of the dark and pounce on her. The more i examined this pattern, the clearer it became what i have always been seeking.
I've never told a girl that i loved her first. Now some of you may think this is common among menfolk. My reasonings do not necessarily follow the typical male reticence to admit love. I can count on two fingers the number of girls i've approached and asked out, whether it was at a bar, a cafe, the library, a store. Anywhere. I let them come to me. I let them express any semblance of attraction before i moved on them. That would be in the kindest and most humane instances. There were many girls who expressed their affection, and i would play with them, sadistically toiling with them, but never indulging their wishes. I'm not proud of that. Much of this i'm not proud of, but i recognize why i acted this way. I acted according to a code that resembled that of Bram Stoker's most copied character. I needed to be invited in before i would feast upon her flesh.
In my massive library of pornographic material (consisting of items that are both overtly and unintentionally pornographic), the stories, images, or videos make up a curatorial exhibit on the act of consent. Sure, littered amongst the articles are those few shots where a girl suffers without any clear evidence of her wanting to be there, but those are so rare, especially considering the size of my collection (Bigger or smaller than the Library of Congress? Don't insult me with a comparison to that book cart). The long thread that weaves in and out of the various kinky sundries i nibble on - whether it be a girl enveloped in layers of latex and turned into a rubber doll, or a simple over the knee ritual swatting - uniting the diversity into one theme is the implied or proudly stated desire to participate. I lose my marbles so much quicker watching a girl suffer in agony knowing that she would give her last marbles to partake in this ordeal.
My pursuit is not the act of gaining permission and then, only then, proceeding with my twisted agenda. The actual accordance to proceed makes up a large part of the enticement. My mouth has long hydrated itself when it has found a female victim who wants me to infect her with my sordid and dangerously medieval mind. Once i have her, the constant presence of her willingness fuels my twistedness, pushing me to search the extents of my own sadism.
6 comments:
Reading your post, I was reminded of this poem. Though perhaps the spider was a bit more aggressive and less circumspect than yourself?
Nonetheless, there are some similarities. :)
LOOOOVE this line:
but she ne'er came out again!
It's repeated a few times, and each time it made me think of the thrill i get from transforming someone. The action of turning them into someone different, someone who i define.
Fascinating. i don't know what else to say! This certainly allows your readers a glimpse into those "other" areas, sometimes, what us women (submissive or not) wonder about men (Dominant or not). Which is not to project that you are a model or a trendsetter or even the "norm" amongst the other race, but even a glimpse into well-kept and locked secrets of dating, the rules of attraction, and measuring prey to inflict your sordid desires upon is fascinating.
Well, i think so but then again, i'm neither a good representative of the female or submissive pile and have my own unique charter for psychoanalytical measuring. i appreciated this.
toy
you explain your thrill in the quest to obtain her consent quite well. what struck me, reading this, was how much i kept eroticizing the frustration i imagined many of these girls felt as they struggled to grant you the permission you sought.
i remembered, there is nothing worse (and nothing hotter) than meeting with a man who witholds the physical attention i am used to easily receiving. i have only experienced this kind of baiting a handful of times, but it always drove me wild with frustration-tainted desire.
thanks for reminding me how much i crave that.
*lg
toy,
Oh dear. Did i ruin things for future conquests? Do handle these trade secrets with discretion, won't you?
little girl,
I have experienced a reaction similar to what you refer to. "Nobody's EVER turned me down."
I've sent many a girl home without the furthering of our intimate agenda. Again, i'm not exactly proud of everytime i've done it. However, it is simply my pleasure to remind you of how much you enjoyed this rebuke.
I think it's very fun to be played with in that way, like, being kept on a string like that. But you get tired of it. I am glad that you don't have to play this games with your spouse.
Post a Comment